Board Thread:Admin Support/@comment-27086573-20160308072130/@comment-27086573-20160608051412

While editing the Archer and Vanadis Arc article page, I felt that there are a few things that need to be discussed and agree upon some common editing standards.

These are my opinions about these issues and would like to understand other view points as well.

this part doesn't stop the flow of the story but actually is part of the story flow, so no need to place it in notes.... Something like this "Despite later Regin was rescued during Campaign on repelling Muozinel Invasion on Agnes and Ormea, the power disputes escalates more as Thenardier using dragon for war assets." is pretty much a unneeded spoiler here in my opinion. Basically, because of this, I'm confused now about what the "Story Impact" is supposed to be. In a general, it can be about the prologue of the next volume or highlighting a few points that can be from the next volume. But if we do not stick to some acceptable definition of "Story Impact" and start to add such things that are a not "impact" of the current story on the next volume but are connections to any of the later volumes, then in that case there can be tons of such connections found that may be put in the section. But all those will only make the section look more disorganised and prolong the section to any extent.
 * I think there is no specific need to put some thing in the reference tag as notes, if it doesn't break the flow of the story. For example, "Tigre becomes very popular especially among the Leitmeritz's archers as he discusses with Rurick and the other archers about the bow equipment during their training and also teaches them more about archery skills and knowledge which makes them impressed over his knowledge of archery that surpasses them."
 * Another thing, that I think can be different is the "Story Impact" section. Earlier, it was filled with references from all the different volume that were far ahead and had no immediate connection to this story arc.